From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-db8lp0184.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.184] helo=db8outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VGRGu-00045s-K3 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:22:13 +0000 Message-ID: <5224670F.6000703@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 18:23:11 +0800 From: Huang Shijie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hector Palacios Subject: Re: gpmi-nand driver and jffs2 support References: <522062B4.4080709@digi.com> <52206C05.8020701@freescale.com> <5220AB35.9080409@digi.com> <20130831025344.GA9971@gmail.com> <5220B8F6.3080405@digi.com> <20130831033438.GA13704@gmail.com> <5220C8C4.5010305@digi.com> <5220CB56.7040505@digi.com> <20130831133728.GA22069@gmail.com> <52244886.8060205@digi.com> <52244B22.3020605@freescale.com> <52244F85.4030904@digi.com> <52245171.3050900@freescale.com> <52246421.1020900@digi.com> In-Reply-To: <52246421.1020900@digi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "fabio.estevam@freescale.com" , Marek Vasut , Huang Shijie , "u-boot@lists.denx.de" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , scottwood@freescale.com, Fabio Estevam List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , =E4=BA=8E 2013=E5=B9=B409=E6=9C=8802=E6=97=A5 18:10, Hector Palacios =E5=86= =99=E9=81=93: > So does this mean that U-Boot is now unable to properly write a JFFS2=20 > partition for it to be understood by the linux-next=20 For the gpmi nand controller, the uboot is not proper to write a jffs2 no= w. > kernel? What is exactly the difference? Does it only affect Freescale=20 > NAND controllers? I think there are many difference. Just diff the nand_base.c, you can=20 see there are many patches merged in the kernel's mtd code, but not exit in the uboot's mtd code. AFAIK, only the gpmi is affected now. thanks Huang Shijie