From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <52CE7C44.1000803@ti.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:09:00 +0530 From: Sekhar Nori MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ivan.khoronzhuk" , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: davinci: aemif: get rid of davinci-nand driver dependency on aemif References: <1386267092-18615-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> <52B18C44.2000305@ti.com> <52B1915A.7060309@ti.com> <52BC1BB8.2070007@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <52BC1BB8.2070007@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, pawel.moll@arm.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@kernel.crashing.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Santosh Shilimkar , Rob Landley , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 26 December 2013 05:36 PM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote: > On 12/18/2013 02:13 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 05:21 PM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote: >>> Hi, Sekhar >>> >>> This patch is based on "Reuse davinci-nand driver for Keystone arch" >>> series. >>> The series has passed review at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/17/241 >>> and can be found at http://git.infradead.org/l2-mtd.git >>> >>> This patch can be still applied on top of the series without conflicts. >>> >>> Can you please pick up the $subject patch if you are OK with it? >> >> I have no problems with the patch and can pick it too, but need ack from >> MTD maintainer (David) as it touches drivers/mtd/ too. >> >> David, >> >> If you do not have the patch, we can resend it. >> >> Thanks, >> Sekhar >> > > Hi Brian, > > Do you agree if this patch will go through Davinci tree? > > This is the last one we need to reuse Davinci Nand driver for Keystone. Since we never got an ack from MTD folks, I am going and go ahead and try pushing this through ARM-SoC regardless. I will CC the MTD maintainers on the pull request so any objections could even be posted there. Thanks, Sekhar