From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] jffs2: avoid soft-lockup in jffs2_reserve_space_gc()
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:04:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530DD83D.5090507@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140226021709.GD4194@ld-irv-0074>
>> fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff -puN fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c~jffs2-avoid-soft-lockup-in-jffs2_reserve_space_gc fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
>> --- a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c~jffs2-avoid-soft-lockup-in-jffs2_reserve_space_gc
>> +++ a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
>> @@ -211,20 +211,25 @@ out:
>> int jffs2_reserve_space_gc(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, uint32_t minsize,
>> uint32_t *len, uint32_t sumsize)
>> {
>> - int ret = -EAGAIN;
>> + int ret;
>> minsize = PAD(minsize);
>>
>> jffs2_dbg(1, "%s(): Requested 0x%x bytes\n", __func__, minsize);
>>
>> - spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
>> - while(ret == -EAGAIN) {
>> + while (true) {
>> + spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
>> ret = jffs2_do_reserve_space(c, minsize, len, sumsize);
>> if (ret) {
>> jffs2_dbg(1, "%s(): looping, ret is %d\n",
>> __func__, ret);
>> }
>> + spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
>> +
>> + if (ret == -EAGAIN)
>> + cond_resched();
>
> Just curious: would this be a place to use cond_resched_lock(), and keep
> the lock outside the loop?
>
Yeah, cond_resched_lock() can be used too, but doesn't make much difference.
This patch adds 5 LOC, and using cond_resched_lock() will also add 5 LOC.
As you've already merged it, I think it isn't worth borthing to make this change.
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
index 0331072..36e9538 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
@@ -223,6 +223,11 @@ int jffs2_reserve_space_gc(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, uint32_t mi
nsize,
jffs2_dbg(1, "%s(): looping, ret is %d\n",
__func__, ret);
}
+
+ if (ret == -EAGAIN)
+ cond_resched_lock(&c->erease_completion_lock);
+ else
+ break;
}
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
>> + else
>> + break;
>> }
>> - spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
>> if (!ret)
>> ret = jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs(c, c->nextblock, 1);
>>
>
> Anyway, pushed to l2-mtd.git.
>
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20140212204456.E010B5A40F6@corp2gmr1-2.hot.corp.google.com>
2014-02-26 2:17 ` [patch 3/4] jffs2: avoid soft-lockup in jffs2_reserve_space_gc() Brian Norris
2014-02-26 12:04 ` Li Zefan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530DD83D.5090507@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).