From: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Kamlakant Patel <kamlakant.patel@broadcom.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
Wang Guoli <andy.wangguoli@huawei.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Ajesh Kunhipurayil Vijayan <ajesh@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: JFFS2 locking issue on 3.14 + patches
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 07:43:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53608D6C.3020008@monstr.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140429170530.GA9418@norris-Latitude-E6410>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4151 bytes --]
On 04/29/2014 07:05 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> + Artem
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:02:07PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 04/28/2014 06:51 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:57:12PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> we are having this problem with JFFS2 rootfs. It is v3.14 kernel
>>>> with these 5 patches which cherry-picked from 3.15.
>>>>
>>>> 41bf1a2 jffs2: Fix crash due to truncation of csize
>>>> 3367da5 jffs2: Fix segmentation fault found in stress test
>>>> 01887a3 jffs2: unlock f->sem on error in jffs2_new_inode()
>>>> 13b546d jffs2: avoid soft-lockup in jffs2_reserve_space_gc()
>>>> 3ead957 jffs2: remove from wait queue after schedule()
>>>
>>> Have you bisected these? And possibly test the patches in isolation
>>> (there are only 5)?
> [...]
>> Bisecting these five patches don't solve anything.
>
> BTW, for your bisecting, did you have a clean version of your
> filesystem? After a bug creates CRC / data errors, it's possible
> that--no matter what kernel you boot--you will retain those errors on
> your flash media.
I didn't see any problem like this. It means filesystem
is not corrupted when CRC problem happen.
>> Locking issue was introduced 3.6-rc3 by this commit.
>> I will check CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER option.
>
> Sorry, I think I misread your first report; your problem is probably not
> with any of these 5 patches, but with some other yet-unsolved issue.
Yes that's my impression too.
>> commit a445f784ae5558a3da680aa6b39ed53c95a551c1
>> Author: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
>> Date: Thu Aug 23 10:10:07 2012 +0300
>>
>> JFFS2: fix unmount regression
>>
>> This patch fixes regression introduced by
>> "8bdc81c jffs2: get rid of jffs2_sync_super". We submit a delayed work in order
>> to make sure the write-buffer is synchronized at some point. But we do not
>> flush it when we unmount, which causes an oops when we unmount the file-system
>> and then the delayed work is executed.
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue by adding a "cancel_delayed_work_sync()" infocation
>> in the '->sync_fs()' handler. This will make sure the delayed work is canceled
>> on sync, unmount and re-mount. And because VFS always callse 'sync_fs()' before
>> unmounting or remounting, this fixes the issue.
>>
>> Reported-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.5+]
>> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
>> Tested-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
>
> Bisection turned you up here?
I have looked at it more and JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER is broken from this commit.
When you disable it is working till this commit on Microblaze.
commit ac093f8d5e76be1f2654acfd7a59d339ba037654
Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
microblaze: uaccess s/might_sleep/might_fault/
And surprisingly the same change is causing problem on ARM.
commit ad72907acd2943304c292ae36960bb66e6dc23c9
Author: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
ARM: 7528/1: uaccess: annotate [__]{get,put}_user functions with might_fault()
I have revert these 2 patches and disable JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER
on the top of that 5 patches and everything seems to work.
Then I have tried to disable debug locking features which I have ON
and I have ended up that disabling CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
and CRC problem is back again.
> Honestly, I'm not too familiar with JFFS2. Maybe Artem can comment,
> since he authored this commit.
Is someone doing any testing on JFFS2 at all?
From this debugging it looks like that JFFS2 have some serious issues
for quite a long time.
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-30 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-28 15:57 JFFS2 locking issue on 3.14 + patches Michal Simek
2014-04-28 16:44 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2014-04-28 16:51 ` Brian Norris
2014-04-29 12:02 ` Michal Simek
2014-04-29 17:05 ` Brian Norris
2014-04-30 5:43 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2014-05-16 6:10 ` Brian Norris
2014-05-16 6:43 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53608D6C.3020008@monstr.eu \
--to=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=ajesh@broadcom.com \
--cc=andy.wangguoli@huawei.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=kamlakant.patel@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox