From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Wjqa2-0005gx-H8 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 13:47:47 +0000 Message-ID: <5370D0E5.4040800@nod.at> Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 15:47:17 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luka Perkov , John Crispin Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: add a ubi forced detach ioctl References: <1399850250-24616-1-git-send-email-luka@openwrt.org> <53709292.6070600@phrozen.org> <20140512104400.GA24995@w500.lan> In-Reply-To: <20140512104400.GA24995@w500.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: John Crispin , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 12.05.2014 12:44, schrieb Luka Perkov: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:21:22AM +0200, John Crispin wrote: >> This is a ugly temporary patch that we carry around in openwrt until we >> have a real fix. why are you trying to upstream this ? > > I didn't think this is a hack, other file systems can force umount as > well. What are you proposing as a real fix? You're messing with UBI, not UBIFS. :-) So, what problem is your patch solving and why do we need it upstream? Thanks, //richard