linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com, hs@denx.de
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: UBI: fix rb_tree node comparison in add_map commit buggy?
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:52:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A92040.7020101@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403587860.7903.82.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>

Am 24.06.2014 07:31, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 07:26 +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Hello Artem,
>>
>> Am 24.06.2014 06:59, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
>>> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 21:07 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>> I think it would be better to "fix" the whole logic such that low volume ids go into
>>>> the left rb node instead of the right.
>>>> Just to avoid further confusion.
>>>> Artem, do you know why UBI does it the other way around for volume ids?
>>>
>>> I do not remember. Probably no particular reason.
>>>
>>> I'd suggest to do a quick fix first and submit to Linus for 3.16, and
>>> then people can do whatever logic streamlining for 3.17, makes sense?
>>
>> I posted such a patch, but for some reason, I could not find it in
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2014-June/date.html
>>
>> Here an extract from the header I got, as I was on Cc ...
>>
>> From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
>> To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>,
>> 	Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
>> 	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
>> 	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
>> 	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
>> 	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
>> 	Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>,
>> 	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [PATCH] ubi: fix correct rb_tree node comparison in add_vol
>> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:27:09 +0200
>> Message-Id: <1403530029-12151-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de>
>> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1
> 
> I do not see it in my @linux.intel.com mailbox either, probably
> something went wrong on your side?

Same here.

Thanks,
//richard

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-24  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <53A7EF04.7040805@denx.de>
     [not found] ` <53A809A3.30703@denx.de>
2014-06-23 11:58   ` UBI: fix rb_tree node comparison in add_map commit buggy? Richard Weinberger
2014-06-23 12:41   ` Richard Weinberger
2014-06-23 13:05     ` Heiko Schocher
2014-06-23 19:07       ` Richard Weinberger
2014-06-24  4:59         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-24  5:26           ` Heiko Schocher
2014-06-24  5:31             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-06-24  6:52               ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2014-06-24  6:53           ` Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53A92040.7020101@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=hs@denx.de \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).