From: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
To: <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ubifs error at boot "bad node type"
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:06:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C66ACD.5090508@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405499347.1906.2.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
On 2014/7/16 16:29, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 12:10 +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
>> ubiattach is ok:
>> # ubiattach -m 3
>> [ 50.164062] UBI: default fastmap pool size: 95
>> [ 50.164062] UBI: default fastmap WL pool size: 25
>
> I do not know why this happened, I never saw reports like this before.
> Most probably this is because of fastmap. I did not hear any report that
> it was extensively verified WRT power cuts, and my theory is that there
> is a bug in fastmap which causes this, and this may be related to power
> cuts. I do not have proves, but suggest you to dig in this direction.
> E.g., setup power-cut testing.
>
My colleague who use UBIFS with kernel v2.6.34(WR4?) hit
an error like this:
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_read_node: bad node type (255 but expected 0)
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_read_node: bad node at LEB 112:67824, LEB mapping status 1
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_iget: failed to read inode 1, error -22
He said he was running UBIFS for 3 years and would hit this
error about one time per year.
I googled these error messages and found some same reports
in 2010~2012. So I think this problem is fixed by early
fixes, I asked him to backport this patch set
[PATCH 00/13] UBI reliability improvements
but I'm sure of that. After this error report, I was
worrying about this bug still left.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-08 10:10 ubifs error at boot "bad node type" Richard Genoud
2014-07-09 0:51 ` hujianyang
2014-07-09 7:23 ` Richard Genoud
2014-07-16 8:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-07-16 12:02 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-16 12:26 ` Richard Genoud
2014-07-16 12:32 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-16 14:39 ` Richard Genoud
2014-07-16 12:33 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-07-16 12:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-16 12:06 ` hujianyang [this message]
2014-07-16 12:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C66ACD.5090508@huawei.com \
--to=hujianyang@huawei.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox