From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XgFeN-0002AF-D4 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:17:40 +0000 Message-ID: <54453589.50507@nod.at> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:17:13 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dedekind1@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] UBI: Fastmap: Care about the protection queue References: <1412029248-22454-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1412029248-22454-4-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1412346676.3795.62.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <542EF3BF.1070401@nod.at> <1413206263.7906.18.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <543BE21F.5020504@nod.at> <1413213803.7906.45.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <543C3E60.4080507@nod.at> <1413282203.7906.72.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <543F9895.7010502@nod.at> <1413816389.7906.336.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <544527A3.7030508@nod.at> <1413819635.7906.369.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <54453178.3050903@nod.at> <1413821350.7906.392.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1413821350.7906.392.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 20.10.2014 um 18:09 schrieb Artem Bityutskiy: > On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 17:59 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Also, say, PEB X is in the work queue waiting for erasure. Fastmap comes >>> along and saves it as "must be erased" in the fastmap. Fastmap finishes >>> its job, PEB X gets erased, and I write my data there, so PEB X is >>> referred to by LEB Y. Now I have power cut. Then I attach the flash >>> again. Surely it is not that fastmap just erases PEB X and I lose the >>> contents of LEB Y? >> >> This cannot happen. If X is erased you cannot write data do it. I must first go >> thought the pool and the pool is scanned while attaching. > > Just noticed from the code that we first add PEBs to the erase list, and > then we go an scan the pools. In the attach code, yes. But this does not matter. It cannot happen that a fastmap is written with a PEB being in a pool and the erase job list. If you figure out such a state, please tell me. I'll fix it. :-) Thanks, //richard