From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XgJdS-0005LG-6P for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:32:59 +0000 Message-ID: <54457160.6040404@nod.at> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:32:32 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Murray Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: ubi: Use UBI_METAONLY constraint for renames References: <1413750419-7020-1-git-send-email-amurray@embedded-bits.co.uk> <5444ECD2.2010107@nod.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Ezequiel Garcia , Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 20.10.2014 um 13:32 schrieb Andrew Murray: > On 20 October 2014 12:06, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 19.10.2014 um 22:26 schrieb Andrew Murray: >>> Renaming a volume does not alter nor read volume data - thus the existing >>> UBI_READWRITE constraint can be weakened. This patch provides a new >>> UBI_METAONLY constraint and updates the UBI rename logic to use it. >>> >>> This change permits the rename of a mounted volume which enables support >>> for additional methods of firmware upgrade - see discussion at >>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/398784 >>> >>> This patch differs from that of the original discussion through the addition >>> on an additional 'break' statement. >> >> Thanks for pointing out. I fat-fingered that. >> >>> Cc: Ezequiel Garcia >>> Tested-by: Andrew Murray >>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger >>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray >> >> This is not a valid SoB chain. You are not the author of this patch >> nor went it thought me. Please don't resend patches as your work. >> > > Apologies that wasn't my intention - I got this wrong. I attempted to > clearly attribute the author through the patch description and > patchwork history and through the signed-off (I'll ask next time). I > added my sign-off due to my (very trivial) addition. No big deal. :) Thanks, //richard