From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XgW2d-0007Kj-6x for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:47:47 +0000 Message-ID: <54462BB6.5020405@atmel.com> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:47:34 +0200 From: Cyrille Pitchen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jffs2: fix buffer dump debug output References: <21ad981db8c65d3f00be3d9a254cae78cf40b96d.1413878259.git.cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com> <1413879465.12828.1.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <1413879465.12828.1.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Le 21/10/2014 10:17, Joe Perches a écrit : > On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 10:05 +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote: >> This patch fixes __jffs2_dbg_dump_buffer(): this function prints a message >> claiming to dump len bytes. However, depending on the start offset, the former >> code drops up to 31 (JFFS2_BUFDUMP_BYTES_PER_LINE - 1) bytes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen >> --- >> fs/jffs2/debug.c | 21 ++++++++------------- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/jffs2/debug.c b/fs/jffs2/debug.c >> index 07bd5bc..1b515b2 100644 >> --- a/fs/jffs2/debug.c >> +++ b/fs/jffs2/debug.c >> @@ -736,30 +736,25 @@ void >> __jffs2_dbg_dump_buffer(unsigned char *buf, int len, uint32_t offs) >> { >> int skip; >> - int i; >> + int i, pos; >> >> printk(JFFS2_DBG_MSG_PREFIX " dump from offset %#08x to offset %#08x (%x bytes).\n", >> offs, offs + len, len); >> - i = skip = offs % JFFS2_BUFDUMP_BYTES_PER_LINE; >> + i = skip = offs & (JFFS2_BUFDUMP_BYTES_PER_LINE - 1); >> offs = offs & ~(JFFS2_BUFDUMP_BYTES_PER_LINE - 1); >> >> - if (skip != 0) >> - printk(JFFS2_DBG "%#08x: ", offs); >> - >> + printk(JFFS2_DBG "%#08x: ", offs); >> while (skip--) >> printk(" "); >> >> - while (i < len) { >> - if ((i % JFFS2_BUFDUMP_BYTES_PER_LINE) == 0 && i != len -1) { >> - if (i != 0) >> - printk("\n"); >> + for (pos = 0; pos < len; ++pos, ++i) { >> + if (i == JFFS2_BUFDUMP_BYTES_PER_LINE) { >> offs += JFFS2_BUFDUMP_BYTES_PER_LINE; >> - printk(JFFS2_DBG "%0#8x: ", offs); >> + printk(JFFS2_DBG "\n%0#8x: ", offs); >> + i = 0; > > print_hex_dump would be better > > Hi Joe, thanks for your comment. Indeed using print_hex_dump() would be a good idea since it would avoid each driver to implement its own version of buffer dumps. Reading the source code of print_hex_dump(), the output format would change a little bit: the output would no longer be aligned to JFFS2_BUFDUMP_BYTES_PER_LINE boundary using leading spaces. If it's ok to change the output format it's good for me as well.