From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XgtWD-0005Hz-0g for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:51:54 +0000 Message-ID: <54478C2F.9080208@nod.at> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:51:27 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tanya Brokhman , Sascha Hauer , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ubiformat: Leave space for fastmap anchor References: <1413964111-4048-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1413964111-4048-3-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <54476785.5020603@nod.at> <544768A5.5000505@codeaurora.org> <54476C0F.4050603@nod.at> <54478B6A.4020106@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <54478B6A.4020106@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 22.10.2014 um 12:48 schrieb Tanya Brokhman: > On 10/22/2014 11:34 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 22.10.2014 um 10:19 schrieb Tanya Brokhman: >>> I care :) Its in my TODO to update ubinize to leave space for fastmap anchor (and perhaps generate a fastmap data as well but this is just a thought). >> >> While talking about fastmap TODOs, here you can find my fastmap patch queue: >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rw/misc.git/log/?h=ubi-current >> >> These patches are *not* ready for mainline, some of them need a rewrite >> to meet all design goals of UBI. But maybe the one or other fixes an issue >> which is on your TODO list. :-) >> >> Thanks, >> //richard >> > > thanks! it's very helpful! and just to combine the reply in one email: > > "Please generate the fastmap data such that upon the very first attach fastmap can be used." > > This is what I was thinking. Its doable, right? since in ubinize we have all data required for constructing fastmap. Of course it is doable. :) > From all your discussions with Artem I figure we can expect quite a few changes to the fastmap implementation. Is the layout also going to change? I remember you mentioning such > idea in one of the emails. So far the layout is not going to change. Thanks, //richard