From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.64]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XmgV0-0001eI-DE for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:10:35 +0000 Message-ID: <545C9A1B.6020905@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:08:27 +0800 From: hujianyang MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities References: <1415023112-21704-1-git-send-email-tlinder@codeaurora.org> <1415201733.958.121.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1415201733.958.121.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tanya Brokhman , Richard Weinberger , open list , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Brian Norris , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 2014/11/5 23:35, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 15:58 +0200, Tanya Brokhman wrote: >> If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to >> distinguish between messages from different UBI devices. >> Add device number to all ubi layer message types. >> >> The R/O block driver messages were replaced by pr_* since >> ubi_device structure is not used by it. >> >> Amended a bit by Artem. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman >> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy > > Oh, the entire patch-set again... this means we need to review it again! > Please, have a mercy! :-) It is huge! Please, send a small patch against > the one which I pushed already. Thanks! > That means I can't add a Reviewed-by on this huge one... What a pity~! ^.^ > Artem. > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ > >