public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>, Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: improve wait-till-ready timeout loop
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:23:52 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54725068.2010909@vanguardiasur.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54724EBA.3040904@vanguardiasur.com.ar>

On 11/23/2014 06:16 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On 11/05/2014 07:32 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
>> There are a few small issues with the timeout loop in
>> spi_nor_wait_till_ready():
>>
>>  * The first operation should not be a reschedule; we should check the
>>    status register at least once to see if we're complete!
>>
>>  * We should check the status register one last time after declaring the
>>    deadline has passed, to prevent a premature timeout erro (this is
>>    theoretically possible if we sleep for a long time after the previous
>>    status register check).
>>
>>  * Add an error message, so it's obvious if we ever hit a timeout.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> index 5e3a1d363895..d0dcaa1372ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> @@ -202,19 +202,24 @@ static int spi_nor_ready(struct spi_nor *nor)
>>  static int spi_nor_wait_till_ready(struct spi_nor *nor)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long deadline;
>> -	int ret;
>> +	int timeout = 0, ret;
>>  
>>  	deadline = jiffies + MAX_READY_WAIT_JIFFIES;
>>  
>> -	do {
>> -		cond_resched();
>> +	while (!timeout) {
>> +		if (time_after_eq(jiffies, deadline))
>> +			timeout = 1;
>>  
>>  		ret = spi_nor_ready(nor);
>>  		if (ret < 0)
>>  			return ret;
>>  		if (ret)
>>  			return 0;
>> -	} while (!time_after_eq(jiffies, deadline));
>> +
>> +		cond_resched();
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	dev_err(nor->dev, "flash operation timed out\n");
>>  
>>  	return -ETIMEDOUT;
>>  }
>>
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
> 

On a second look... I find more readable to use a bool type for
booleans, but it's just a silly nitpick.

-- 
Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-23 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-05 10:32 [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: improve wait-till-ready timeout loop Brian Norris
2014-11-06  3:44 ` Huang Shijie
2014-11-23 21:16 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-11-23 21:23   ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2014-11-26  6:54 ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54725068.2010909@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
    --to=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox