From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Xwa6c-0000zI-Hu for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 17:22:19 +0000 Message-ID: <54809831.1060503@nod.at> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:21:53 +0100 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tanya Brokhman , dedekind1@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] UBI: Fastmap: Ensure that all fastmap work is done upon WL shutdown References: <1416835236-25185-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1416835236-25185-4-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1417102739.5858.112.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <54808F8B.6030807@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <54808F8B.6030807@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 04.12.2014 um 17:44 schrieb Tanya Brokhman: > On 11/27/2014 5:38 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-11-24 at 14:20 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> ...otherwise the deferred work might run after datastructures >>> got freed and corrupt memory. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger >>> --- >>> drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 3 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c >>> index 7f135df..cb2e571 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c >>> @@ -2041,6 +2041,9 @@ static void protection_queue_destroy(struct ubi_device *ubi) >>> void ubi_wl_close(struct ubi_device *ubi) >>> { >>> dbg_wl("close the WL sub-system"); >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_UBI_FASTMAP >>> + flush_work(&ubi->fm_work); >>> +#endif >> >> If you are using the work infrastructure implemented in wl.c, then >> fastmap work should be no different to any other work. And we do flush >> all works in 'shutdown_work()'. The fastmap work should be flushed there >> too. > > I tend to agree with Artem. Could you please move it to shutdown_work()? I'm asking because I do want to pick up all the bug fixes patches, but not going to pick up the "cleaning > up" patches at this point. Okay. You have overruled me. :-) Thanks, //richard