From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1XxQtA-0002Zd-Rp
 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 01:43:57 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id l13so1251685iga.3
 for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:43:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5483B0C5.9080703@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 20:43:33 -0500
From: nick <xerofoify@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What does oob stand for in mtd.h?
References: <54827EEB.7030305@gmail.com>
 <CAFLxGvyzcdwfNs6DJC4XT_yFH4yJBiqV_UV-JCavmcCeSdCd4w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFLxGvyzcdwfNs6DJC4XT_yFH4yJBiqV_UV-JCavmcCeSdCd4w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

Greetings Richard,
I do understand your concern and if you look at the logs for lkml, I have  got two patches accepted into the mainline.
If there are any other ways I can prove that I am changed my attitude please let me known.

On 2014-12-06 05:55 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 4:58 AM, nick <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Greetings MTD subsystem developers,
>> I am wondering what oob stands for in mtd.h as a lot of functions are using it in their names. This would greatly need in me understanding the core of this subsystem if something points out what this stands for.
>> Regards and Thanks,
>> Nick
> 
> BTW: I'll NACK every single patch from you which touches MTD until you
> prove that you have a setup to test
> your patches and completely changed your attitude.
> 
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Malevolent-Developer-Trolls-Linux-Kernel-Development-with-Lots-of-Broken-Patches-453709.shtml
>