From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1Xxbok-0001uT-71
 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:24:06 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h15so1519966igd.14
 for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 05:23:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548454DA.9060902@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:23:38 -0500
From: nick <xerofoify@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What does oob stand for in mtd.h?
References: <54827EEB.7030305@gmail.com>	<CAFLxGvyzcdwfNs6DJC4XT_yFH4yJBiqV_UV-JCavmcCeSdCd4w@mail.gmail.com>	<5483B0C5.9080703@gmail.com>
 <CACna6rxHgwa8A+om-yhcGU9gr+RjauqJu_SpTuUn1_sY+OqNQA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACna6rxHgwa8A+om-yhcGU9gr+RjauqJu_SpTuUn1_sY+OqNQA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
 "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

Rafal,
Clearly you did not read the logs more carefully. My patch was accepted for x86 kvm subsystem.
Regards Nick

On 2014-12-07 05:36 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 7 December 2014 at 02:43, nick <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I do understand your concern and if you look at the logs for lkml, I have  got two patches accepted into the mainline.
>> If there are any other ways I can prove that I am changed my attitude please let me known.
> 
> Your reputation seems to be known for months and only recently you
> tried to fool us (me) with your b43 patch
> [PATCH] drivers:net:wireless: Add mutex locking for function,
> b43_op_beacon_set_time in main.c
> 
> I don't think anything has changed in the last 9 days (since b43 patch).
>