From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>, artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Sheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Current linux-next status of UBI/UBIFS? Re: new UBI co-maintainer
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:47:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C90484.4050001@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C84CC2.6060708@huawei.com>
Hi!
Am 28.01.2015 um 03:43 schrieb hujianyang:
> On 2015/1/22 17:26, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to give Richard Weinberger UBI tree push rights, so that he
>> could help us improving the QoS.
>>
>> If no one objects, lets make it effective.
>>
>
> Hi Artem,
>
> First, thank Richard for his contributions to UBI/UBIFS.
>
>
> I regret to say the updating of UBI/UBIFS was blocked about 2 months.
> So Richard could help us maintaining the improvement of UBIFS next?
>
> I've sent some patches to MTD list these days, what's the opinion of
> you and Richard about these pacthes?
>
> [PATCH] UBI: add ubi_err() to report the failure of leb read
IIRC I had some questions on that patch. If all questions are resolved I'm fine with it.
> [PATCH RFC 1/2] UBIFS: fix empty log leb error
These patches look okay to me but as they are posted as RFC I really want
a comment from Artem on them.
> [PATCH] UBI: fix soft lockup in ubi_check_volume()
I'm also fine with that.
> and ubidump v6
For ubidump I have to read the whole thread again as I got lost in it. :)
> The patch "UBI: fix soft lockup in ubi_check_volume()" solves a really
> important problem, I wish it could be merged into stable soon.
Yes.
> I've discussed with Richard about the recovery of an corrupted UBIFS
> image, for example, ECC error. And actually my colleagues and I had
> worked out some features to improve the reliability of UBIFS. We are
> happy to share our design and greatly aspire the help from community.
Nice.
> Also, I think we could start to add more functions to my ubidump to
> make it a useful tool.
I have to look at ubidump in detail but it sounds good.
To debug fastmap issues I have also a tool to analyze UBI images.
Maybe we can merge. First I have to shape it up.
> I think the updating of UBI/UBIFS will re-start soon, am I right?
Correct. Currently I'm preparing the tree.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-28 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 9:26 new UBI co-maintainer Artem Bityutskiy
2015-01-22 21:57 ` Brian Norris
2015-01-28 2:43 ` Current linux-next status of UBI/UBIFS? " hujianyang
2015-01-28 15:47 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2015-01-29 3:28 ` hujianyang
2015-01-29 9:08 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C90484.4050001@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=hujianyang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=shengyong1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox