linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Scian <rnd4@dave-tech.it>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dedekind1@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 23:02:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5525975F.8030502@dave-tech.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55250446.40707@nod.at>

Il 08/04/2015 12:34, Richard Weinberger ha scritto:
> Am 02.04.2015 um 21:19 schrieb Andrea Scian:
>> Il 02/04/2015 19:54, Richard Weinberger ha scritto:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Am 02.04.2015 um 19:34 schrieb Andrea Scian:
>>>> Richard,
>>>>
>>>> Il 29/03/2015 14:13, Richard Weinberger ha scritto:
>>>>> +	mutex_lock(&ubi->buf_mutex);
>>>>> +	err = ubi_io_read(ubi, ubi->peb_buf, e->pnum, 0, ubi->peb_size);
>>>>> +	mutex_unlock(&ubi->buf_mutex);
>>>>> +	if (err == UBI_IO_BITFLIPS) {
>>>>> +		dbg_wl("found bitflips in PEB %d", e->pnum);
>>>>> +		spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
>>>>> +
>>>> IIUC you trigger the action as soon as you have a bitflip error, is this
>>>> correct?
>>> I trigger it as soon UBI sees the bitflip. This depends on the configured MTD
>>> bitflip_threshold.
>>
>> ops.. I confused UBI bitflip error with MTD bitflip error ;-)
>> thanks for point this out and help me understanding the code
>>
>> now it's clear and it sounds good to me
> 
> Is this an implicit Reviewed-by? :)

Yes

Reviewed-by: Andrea Scian <andrea.scian@dave.eu>

(I have lot to learn about submitting kernel patches ;-) )

Unfortunately I cannot review it from a deep technical point of view
because some part of bitrot_check_worker() are not so clear to me (I'm
not an UBI expert and I need to dig a little bit further to have better
understanding), but the idea IMHO is right and it's worth having into UBI

Kind Regards,

-- 

Andrea SCIAN

DAVE Embedded Systems

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-08 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-29 12:13 UBI: Bitrot checking Richard Weinberger
2015-03-29 12:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] UBI: Introduce ubi_schedule_fm_work() Richard Weinberger
2015-03-29 12:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] UBI: Introduce prepare_erase_work() Richard Weinberger
2015-03-29 12:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] UBI: Introduce in_pq() Richard Weinberger
2015-03-29 12:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 17:34   ` Andrea Scian
2015-04-02 17:54     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 19:19       ` Andrea Scian
2015-04-08 10:34         ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-08 21:02           ` Andrea Scian [this message]
2015-04-08 11:48   ` David Oberhollenzer
2015-04-12 14:12   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 16:09     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 16:43       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 16:55         ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 20:42           ` [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking (linux-mtd Digest, Vol 145, Issue 24) Andrea Scian
2015-04-12 21:01             ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 21:30               ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 21:37                 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 21:33               ` Andrea Scian
2015-04-12 21:42                 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-13 17:17                   ` linux-mtd digest emails (was Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking) Brian Norris
2015-04-12 15:14   ` [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 16:14     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 16:31       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 16:32         ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 17:01   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 17:09     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 19:20       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 19:53         ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 21:24           ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 21:34             ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-13  3:36               ` nick
2015-04-12 17:36     ` Richard Weinberger
     [not found] <mailman.38750.1427638218.22890.linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
     [not found] <mailman.40253.1428858576.22890.linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5525975F.8030502@dave-tech.it \
    --to=rnd4@dave-tech.it \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).