From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Yme41-0002o6-4D for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:06:50 +0000 Message-ID: <553DEDFE.2000700@nod.at> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:06:22 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dolev Raviv Subject: Re: planning general storage capacity for y fs References: <006901d08012$3a1f97a0$ae5ec6e0$@codeaurora.org> <007201d080bf$96a0e4e0$c3e2aea0$@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <007201d080bf$96a0e4e0$c3e2aea0$@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, 'Tanya Brokhman' List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 27.04.2015 um 09:55 schrieb Dolev Raviv: > Thanks Richard! > Let me rephrase the question: In the past I knew there was a rule of thumb, 'leave free 30% of the storage space'. Nowadays I couldn't find any reference to this. Most likely because this is and was always kind of superstition. ;) An almost full filesystems has to do more to find free space, but I don't dare to give rules of thumb. > I was wondering, is there a known point in UBIFS (or ext4), where leaving less free storage space, that performance is dropping? Maybe a ratio of free-occupied is not the right way to look at it, but to leave a certain size free (e.g. 50MB)? I don't think so. Maybe Ted can give you more details on ext4. For UBIFS I'd say, figure yourself. i.e. run benchmarks... Thanks, //richard