From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YuQrF-0000T4-T4 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:37:50 +0000 Message-ID: <555A3F76.1000900@nod.at> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 21:37:26 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nick , Brian Norris Subject: Re: Tracking flash IO activity? References: <20150516205354.GK6055@norris-Latitude-E6410> <20150518175702.GO11598@ld-irv-0074> <555A398B.8050203@nod.at> <555A3C01.3030800@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <555A3C01.3030800@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "valent.turkovic@gmail.com" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 18.05.2015 um 21:22 schrieb nick: > I feel that not having a tool like this is a very bad idea, it > may be one of the major issues I or others may have with ubifs > as a file system choice for flash based systems. You stated that > the tool you have is hacky, does this mean in terms of bugs or > coding standards? If the tool works and is fairly stable why not > push to the repo for mtd-tools and mark it as experimental for now. > This way the mtd developers can start working on it and allow you > time to do other more important things with your time as a maintainer. Hacky in terms of, it will kill your hamster and makes your girlfriend cry if you use it not correctly. ;-) Thanks, //richard