From: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
<dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND] mtd-utils: Restructure the mtd-utils source.
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:41:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55924835.7060601@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55924762.5010408@nod.at>
On 06/30/2015 03:38 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 30.06.2015 um 09:27 schrieb Dongsheng Yang:
>> On 06/30/2015 03:19 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am 30.06.2015 um 08:50 schrieb Dongsheng Yang:
>>>> * There is no code modification in this commit, only moving
>>>> * the files to proper place.
>>>>
>>>> The user tools looks a little messy as we place almost
>>>> the all tools in the root directory of mtd-utils. To make
>>>> it more clear, I propose to introduce the following structure
>>>> for our source code.
>>>>
>>>> mtd-utils/
>>>> |-- lib
>>>> |-- include
>>>> |-- misc-utils
>>>> |-- flash-utils
>>>> |-- jffsX-utils
>>>> |-- nand-utils
>>>> |-- nor-utils
>>>> |-- ubi-utils
>>>> |-- ubifs-utils
>>>> `-- tests
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>
>>> Hmm, while I agree with you that the current directory structure is not perfect
>>> I'm not sure if it is worth the hassle. Because your patch hurts git blame.
>>
>> Good point. But seems the git currently is smart enough to show the
>> right history in blame after a rename commit.
>
> Does it also after you've applied the patch file? i.e. git am your.patch.
> IIRC git is able to deal with that only if you keep the patch in git.
I tried to reset --hard and apply it. That works too. And then I tried
to apply this patch to another repo. I got the expected result in blame.
>
> BTW: Your patch does not apply to mtd-utils.git as of today.
Sorry about it. This patch does not apply to latest mtd-utils, I made it
in a local repo. As my working network can not access:
https://git.infradead.org/srv/git/mtd-utils.git/
You know, there are some strange limits about network in lots of china
companies. :(
So, I marked it as RFC to see the opinions about this idea. I have to
wait to go home this night to update my repo and rebase this patch.
Sorry again :(.
Thanx
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-30 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 6:50 [RFC PATCH RESEND] mtd-utils: Restructure the mtd-utils source Dongsheng Yang
2015-06-30 7:19 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-06-30 7:27 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-06-30 7:38 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-06-30 7:41 ` Dongsheng Yang [this message]
2015-06-30 9:29 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55924835.7060601@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox