Re: [PATCH] ubifs: correct the size of nnode in memset

[Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>]

On 08/20/2015 12:29 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:28:52PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>> There is a typo in lpt to memset nnode by the
>> size in sizeof(stuct ubifs_pnode).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Pushed to mtd-utils.git, as it's obvious. Good catch!
>
> I'll take a look at your restructuring patches eventually. But I'll
> usually just defer UBIFS stuff to Richard/Artem/others.

Great, thanx a lot, Brian.
>
>> ---
>>   mkfs.ubifs/lpt.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mkfs.ubifs/lpt.c b/mkfs.ubifs/lpt.c
>> index f6d4352..6aa0b88 100644
>> --- a/mkfs.ubifs/lpt.c
>> +++ b/mkfs.ubifs/lpt.c
>> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ int create_lpt(struct ubifs_info *c)
>>   		goto out;
>>   	}
>>   	memset(pnode, 0 , sizeof(struct ubifs_pnode));
>> -	memset(nnode, 0 , sizeof(struct ubifs_pnode));
>> +	memset(nnode, 0 , sizeof(struct ubifs_nnode));
>
> FWIW, struct ubifs_pnode and struct ubifs_nnode look like they would be
> the same size when using 32-bit pointers, but a bit different (see the
> third field in structs ubifs_nbranch and ubifs_lprops) with 64-bit.

Yes, but in the latest ubifs.h in kernel, they are more different. And
when I updated the ubifs.h, I found the bug.

Thanx
Yang
>
>>
>>   	c->lscan_lnum = c->main_first;
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.4.2
>
> Brian
> .
>