From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZSaPp-0002UW-TQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:42:42 +0000 Message-ID: <55D67287.3000005@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:36:23 +0800 From: Dongsheng Yang MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Chinner , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Gr=FCnba?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?cher?= CC: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: link .out to correct output when we set USE_ATTR_SECURE=yes References: <55D52473.7050209@cn.fujitsu.com> <1440032464-17626-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150820210812.GO3902@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20150820210812.GO3902@dastard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/21/2015 05:08 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:18:28AM +0200, Andreas Gr=FCnbacher wrote: >> Dongsheng, >> >> 2015-08-20 3:01 GMT+02:00 Dongsheng Yang : >>> >>> When we set USE_ATTR_SECURE to yes or no, the expected outputs of gener= ic/062 >>> would be different. So we need to link the .out to different file. >> >> Can the tests for the different namespaces please be separated from >> each other here (see below)? > > I certainly agree with this approach ;) > >> >> diff --git a/tests/generic/062 b/tests/generic/062 >> index 194b638..9dd4498 100755 >> --- a/tests/generic/062 >> +++ b/tests/generic/062 >> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ for nsp in $ATTR_MODES; do >> echo "*** final list (strings, type=3D$inode, nsp=3D$ns= p)" >> getfattr -m '.' -e hex $SCRATCH_MNT/$inode >> >> + # FIXME: Remove all remaining xattrs >> done >> done >> >> Next, can the security namespace tests be put in their own test case >> so that we don't need to switch between two different .out files? This >> could be done by setting ATTR_MODES and then invoking >> tests/generic/062 to avoid duplicating the entire test script. > > Just not the suggested mechanism :) > > We can't execute one test from another - that will lead to all sorts > of bad juju occurring with results and timing and so on because they > are all based on $0. The correct way to do this is to factor the > test internals into a common file, then wrap the common functions > with a new test file. Sounds good, thanx Dave and Andreas. Yang > > e.g. see _test_generic_punch(), which started off as corner case > testing the XFS_IOC_ZERORANGE ioctl in a single test, Then got > extended to testing hole punching in a new test, then got factored > into common functions in common/punch, and it is now called by 14 > different tests.... > > Cheers, > > Dave. >