From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZjP8b-0005OC-RK for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:06:26 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms To: Tony Lindgren References: <1442588029-13769-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <560BC0DB.5020205@ti.com> <20151006083346.GL23801@atomide.com> <56139A72.6040600@ti.com> <20151006100000.GN23801@atomide.com> CC: , , , , , , , , , From: Roger Quadros Message-ID: <56139CE9.8020002@ti.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:05:29 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151006100000.GN23801@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 06/10/15 13:00, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Roger Quadros [151006 02:59]: >> On 06/10/15 11:33, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> Does build and boot and use NAND work throughtout the series? >>> Otherwise we'll have hard time bisecting anything.. >> >> Yes it does with the following exceptions. >> >> - Patch 7 "memory: omap-gpmc: Remove NAND IRQ code" breaks prefetch-irq mode >> but none of the boards seem to be using it so it shouldn't break NAND on existing boards. >> At patch 9 "mtd: nand: omap2: manage NAND interrupts" prefetch-irq mode is working again. >> Do you want me to squash patches 7,8,9 so that pre-fetch irq is not broken at any point? > > OK, no that's fine, no need to squash them together then. > >> - Then at patch 11 "mtd: nand: omap: Clean up device tree support" we break NAND on all DT >> boards as we expect NAND to be a real child node with compatible id. Simply applying the >> DT patch at this point makes it work again. > > Hmm can we at least warn about incompatible DT entry when somebody boots > with an older dtb? Yes that could be done. It looks like we can use the missing compatible property to identify that it is and old DT entry. I'll send a v4 of patch 11. cheers, -roger > >>>> Test procedure was to read an existing ubifs partition, >>>> create a new one and read it back. >>>> >>>> Need you to Ack if it looks good. >>>> Do you mind taking it via omap-soc once MTD maintainers ack their relevant parts? >>> >>> Sure. I'll try to do some testing on the series first too. >>> >> Thanks. >> >>> Can the dts changes be merged separtely? Otherwise we'll have >>> a dependency between dts branch and the GPMC/NAND changes. >> >> I'm afraid no. Patch 11 makes us incompatible with the old DT. > > OK. If we can warn about that, then the out of tree users will > have easier time to update their dts file. > > Regards, > > Tony >