From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153])
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1ZmKaO-0006gq-6Y
 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:51:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: OMAP2+: Update gpmc and nand DT binding
 documentation
To: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
 <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <nsekhar@ti.com>,
 <computersforpeace@gmail.com>, <dwmw2@infradead.org>, <tony@atomide.com>
References: <1444700338-27582-1-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com>
 <1444700338-27582-6-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com>
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Message-ID: <561E417F.4020304@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:50:23 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1444700338-27582-6-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On 13/10/15 04:38, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
> Add additional details to the gpmc and nand documentation to clarify
> what is needed to enable nand dma prefetch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/omap-gpmc.txt | 7 ++++++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt                | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/omap-gpmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/omap-gpmc.txt
> index 704be93..b1e2802 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/omap-gpmc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/omap-gpmc.txt
> @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ Required properties:
>  			As this will change in the future, filling correct
>  			values here is a requirement.
>  
> +GPMC DMA information. Required only when GPMC nand prefetch is enabled.
> + - dmas			GPMC nand prefetch dma channel

s/nand/NAND

> + - dma-names		DMA channel name use as a reference within the Nand driver

s/Nand/NAND

This is inevitably going to be "rxtx". So why not say that it should be "rxtx"

Should these bindings go in bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt instead?

> +
>  Timing properties for child nodes. All are optional and default to 0.
>  
>   - gpmc,sync-clk-ps:	Minimum clock period for synchronous mode, in picoseconds
> @@ -119,7 +123,8 @@ Example for an AM33xx board:
>  		ti,hwmods = "gpmc";
>  		reg = <0x50000000 0x2000>;
>  		interrupts = <100>;
> -
> +		dmas = <&edma 52>;
> +		dma-names = "rxtx";

Why not define these in the NAND node instead of gpmc node?

>  		gpmc,num-cs = <8>;
>  		gpmc,num-waitpins = <2>;
>  		#address-cells = <2>;
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
> index 253e6de..4b0c240 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ Example for an AM33xx board:
>  		ti,hwmods = "gpmc";
>  		reg = <0x50000000 0x36c>;
>  		interrupts = <100>;
> +		dmas = <&edma 52>;
> +		dma-names = "rxtx";
>  		gpmc,num-cs = <8>;
>  		gpmc,num-waitpins = <2>;
>  		#address-cells = <2>;
> 

cheers,
-roger