From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: onenand: fix parameter list build warning To: Miquel Raynal Cc: LKML , Adrian Bunk , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , Adrian Bunk , Boris Brezillon , Kyungmin Park , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse References: <03e45afe-c4f8-e69b-9cba-6a8863296ad4@infradead.org> <20180904233449.32e41787@xps13> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <561f2078-92e8-290f-626c-ff936b7285c1@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:49:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180904233449.32e41787@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 09/04/2018 02:34 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Randy, > > Randy Dunlap wrote on Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:32:04 > -0700: > >> From: Randy Dunlap >> >> Fix build warning in by adding a "stub" struct >> for mtd_oob_ops: >> >> include/linux/mtd/onenand.h: warning: 'struct mtd_oob_ops' declared inside parameter list [enabled by default] >> include/linux/mtd/onenand.h: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default] >> >> Fixes: 607d1cb10426 ("[MTD] [OneNAND] proper onenand_bbt_read_oob() prototype") >> >> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap >> Cc: Kyungmin Park >> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: David Woodhouse >> Cc: Brian Norris >> Cc: Boris Brezillon >> Cc: Marek Vasut >> Cc: Richard Weinberger >> Cc: Adrian Bunk >> Cc: Adrian Bunk >> --- >> include/linux/mtd/onenand.h | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> --- lnx-419-rc2.orig/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h >> +++ lnx-419-rc2/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h >> @@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ struct onenand_manufacturers { >> char *name; >> }; >> >> +struct mtd_oob_ops; >> int onenand_bbt_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, >> struct mtd_oob_ops *ops); >> unsigned onenand_block(struct onenand_chip *this, loff_t addr); > > That's indeed a working solution, but there are a lot of other > structures in this file that come (like mtd_oob_ops) from > linux/mtd/mtd.h so I wonder if it would not make more sense to include > this header here? > > Thanks, > Miquèl Hi, Have you see this from Linus? https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFzMBptQt-QHMR0MM9MA3=1rxcf8ca5qHxrf4Mm0ZobE_A@mail.gmail.com/ thanks, -- ~Randy