From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Han Xu <b45815@freescale.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mtd: fsl-quadspi: Never build on SPARC
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:13:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5629899C.5040404@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151023010757.GI13239@google.com>
On 10/22/2015 06:07 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> + Han
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:31:46AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Attempts to build fsl-quadspi on SPARC fail with
>>
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c: In function 'fsl_qspi_init_lut':
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c:369:1: error:
>> 'LUT_0' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c:418:1: error:
>> pasting "LUT_" and "(" does not give a valid preprocessing token
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c:418:2: error:
>> implicit declaration of function 'LUT_'
>
> I don't think this is only a SPARC problem. The macro concatenation is
> generally suspect.
>
> I see that READ and WRITE are problems at least. If something like
> <linux/fs.h> gets included somehow, then these tokens resolve to
> integers or expressions before they fall through to literal
> concatentation, so we get 'LUT_0' or 'LUT_(1ULL << __REQ_WRITE)' instead
> of 'LUT_READ' and 'LUT_WRITE'.
>
You are right, that deserves a better fix. I'll leave it up to you.
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-21 14:31 [PATCH -next] mtd: fsl-quadspi: Never build on SPARC Guenter Roeck
2015-10-23 1:07 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-23 1:13 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-10-23 16:31 ` Han Xu
2015-10-23 16:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-23 16:55 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5629899C.5040404@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=b45815@freescale.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).