From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1a3q7k-0000x9-3b for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:58:01 +0000 Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so221639353wmv.1 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 10:57:38 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH resubmit 2/2] spi: fsl-espi: make use of max_msg_size in spi_master to handle HW restrictions To: Mark Brown References: <20151119114057.GN31303@sirena.org.uk> <20151119171538.GO31303@sirena.org.uk> <9CDADBED-FD18-4635-82A9-5AB14C9ABCAE@sperl.org> <20151120120502.GT31303@sirena.org.uk> <08871ECD-52DF-4CBF-AF3D-4C3A442C008A@sperl.org> <20151121134946.GI26072@sirena.org.uk> <56507B3B.4080608@gmail.com> <565CB0C0.9060104@gmail.com> <20151201141923.GJ1929@sirena.org.uk> Cc: Brian Norris , Michal Suchanek , Martin Sperl , MTD Maling List , "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" From: Heiner Kallweit Message-ID: <565DECC4.2030507@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:53:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151201141923.GJ1929@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 01.12.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Mark Brown: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:25:36PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> Propagate the 64K message size limitation allowing client drivers >> to deal properly with this limitation. > > Please don't submit patches into the middle of existing threads, it > makes it very confusing trying to work out what the currently proposed > patches are: > > 8592 N T 11/22 Heiner Kallweit (2.1K) │ │ ├─>[PATCH 2/3] mt > 8593 N C 11/22 Michal Suchanek (0.5K) │ │ │ └─> > -> 8594 N T 11/22 Heiner Kallweit (0.9K) │ │ ├─>[PATCH 3/3] sp > 8595 N T 11/30 Heiner Kallweit (1.7K) │ │ ├─>[PATCH v2 1/2] > 8596 N T 11/30 Heiner Kallweit (0.9K) │ │ └─>[PATCH resubmi > 8597 NsF 11/22 To Heiner Kallw (1.4K) │ └─>Re: RfC: Handle > > I *think* the two messages from yesterday are supposed to be a single > patch series but they're buried in the middle of a huge thread at the > same level as some older patches and for soem reason have different tags > (one of which is "resubmit" which is really just adding noise). > Sorry, my mail template referred to the discussion thread. I'll resubmit.