From: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Adding OTP-only device to MTD or CHAR subsystem?
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 15:21:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5681C3E4.4090506@broadcom.com> (raw)
Greg/Brian/Arnd,
We have OTP device drivers for accessing OTP memory in our SoCs.
I looking for the right place and model to place such OTP device drivers.
1) Should we follow the bfin-otp model in drivers/char? This doesn't
seem like the right place to put it although following the bfin example
is quite simple to implement. We actually had a custom set of Ioctl's
that I changed to use the standard file access model used by the bfin
driver. But a custom util is still needed to issue an OTPLOCK command.
I'm guess mtd-utils has such abilities (or should).
2) Instead, should we start adding OTP-only drivers into the MTD
subsystem? Onenand and CFI based MTD devices already have OTP
programmable regions. If we created a new OTP device type in the MTD
subsystem this looks like a good thing to do. mtd-utils could/should be
used to access the OTP device then along with standard fileio operations.
3) Or some other suggestion of where to place OTP device drivers?
Regards,
Scott
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-28 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-28 23:21 Scott Branden [this message]
2015-12-28 23:38 ` Adding OTP-only device to MTD or CHAR subsystem? Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-29 0:32 ` Scott Branden
2016-01-09 11:13 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-01-13 22:05 ` Scott Branden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5681C3E4.4090506@broadcom.com \
--to=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).