From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nuc900_nand: read correct SMISR register To: Brian Norris , Arnd Bergmann References: <9019174.GYajdpGP8V@wuerfel> <20160113215013.GS109450@google.com> <5830403.0pR8UVXPRZ@wuerfel> <20160114002900.GA54220@google.com> Cc: Wan ZongShun , David Woodhouse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Wan Zongshun Message-ID: <56976BA9.2040709@iommu.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:34:33 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160114002900.GA54220@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , -------- Original Message -------- > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 13:50:13 Brian Norris wrote: >>> >>> Looks OK to me, though I kinda hate dragging on support for >>> obviously-unused drivers... >> >> Should we mark that driver in Kconfig as obviously broken then? > > Well, it won't be obviously broken if I apply your patch... But if > that's the right step toward removal, then I could be OK with that. > >> Let's wait for Wan ZongShun to reply first, it's possible that the >> entire w90x900 platform has come to the point where we are better off >> removing it than fixing ancient bugs. > > Sounds good. Actually, Nuvoton should still leverage this upstream w90x900 codes for their old and new arm chip BSP, but I am not sure their open source plan for the new chip now, I will check with Nuvoton for this topic, and give you feedback here, so please hold on its removal. > > Brian >