From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aXnXr-0002pR-3u for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:16:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] memory: omap-gpmc: mtd: nand: Support GPMC NAND on non-OMAP platforms To: Tony Lindgren References: <1455916548-3441-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <20160219220442.GR21202@atomide.com> CC: , , , , , , , , , From: Roger Quadros Message-ID: <56CADFD5.2040205@ti.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:15:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160219220442.GR21202@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 20/02/16 00:04, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Roger Quadros [160219 13:27]: >> Hi, >> >> @Tony >> Patches 15 and 24 are new and will need your review. >> I've modified patch 22 to include the new am335x boards introduced since v4.4. >> >> Patches are based on top of omap-for-v4.6/dt so that the DT changes apply cleanly. > > Looks OK to me. Can we merge the dts changes separately? Otherwise > we will easily end up with tons of conflicts.. I agree. But we just need to keep in mind that NAND functionality will be broken till all the patches in this series are merged. We don't maintain backward compatibility with the old DT implementation. Do you want me to send you the DT patches separately or you can pick up patches 18 to 26? cheers, -roger