From: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
"boris brezillon" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
"Marek Vašut" <marex@denx.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] doc: dt: mtd: add a DT property to enable the use of 4byte-address op codes
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:44:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F54ED2.3030609@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F2B18A.3020107@atmel.com>
Hi all,
Since the framework is named spi-nor, what about spi-nor-4byte-opcodes?
Is it okay for everyone?
It would follow the same pattern as spi-max-frequency which applies to all SPI
devices.
Best regards,
Cyrille
Le 23/03/2016 16:08, Cyrille Pitchen a écrit :
> Hi Rob,
>
> sorry I've sent v3 at the same time as you answered to v2.
> I'll take your comments into account for v4.
>
> Brian, any preference between 4byte-opcodes or m25p-4byte-opcodes?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Cyrille
>
> Le 23/03/2016 13:49, Rob Herring a écrit :
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Cyrille Pitchen
>> <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com> wrote:
>>> This patch adds a new optional DT property which enables an alternative
>>> way of supporting memory size above 16MiB (128Mib). This new mechanism
>>> translates the regular 3byte-address op codes into their 4byte-address
>>> version whereas the old/default mecanism makes the SPI memory enter its
>>> 4byte-address mode, which has annoying side effects for early bootloaders.
>>>
>>> We cannot discover at run time whether the SPI NOR memory supports the
>>> 4byte-address op codes. For instance both Macronix MX25L25635E and
>>> MX25L25673G share the same JEDEC ID (C22019 without any extension byte).
>>> However the first one doesn't support 4byte-address op codes whereas the
>>> second one does.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt | 11 +++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt
>>> index 2c91c03e7eb0..8be610482089 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.txt
>>> @@ -66,6 +66,17 @@ Optional properties:
>>> Refer to your chips' datasheet to check if this is supported
>>> by your chip.
>>>
>>> +- m25p,4byte-opcodes: For memory size above 16MiB (128Mib), use the dedicated
>>
>> m25p is not a vendor. So drop it or m25p-4byte-opcodes.
>>
>>> + 4byte-address opcodes instead of entering the 4byte
>>> + address mode. This mode changes the internal state of the
>>> + chip so may conflict with some early boot loaders, which
>>> + expect to use the regular (Fast) Read opcodes with 3byte
>>> + address.
>>> + However 4byte-address opcodes are not supported by all
>>> + chips and support for them can not be detected at runtime.
>>
>> s/can not/cannot/
>>
>>> + Refer to you chip's datasheet to check if this is
>>> + supported by your chip.
>>> +
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> flash: m25p80@0 {
>>> --
>>> 1.8.2.2
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-25 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-22 15:13 [PATCH v2 0/2] mtd: spi-nor: add an alternative method to support memory >16MiB Cyrille Pitchen
2016-03-22 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Cyrille Pitchen
2016-03-22 16:57 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-22 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] doc: dt: mtd: add a DT property to enable the use of 4byte-address op codes Cyrille Pitchen
2016-03-23 12:49 ` Rob Herring
2016-03-23 15:08 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2016-03-25 14:44 ` Cyrille Pitchen [this message]
2016-04-01 20:42 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F54ED2.3030609@atmel.com \
--to=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).