From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: m25p80: consider max_transfer_size when reading
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:08:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57041B43.2000109@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160405193952.GA5243@localhost>
Am 05.04.2016 um 21:39 schrieb Brian Norris:
> + others
>
> Hi Heiner,
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:50:11PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Some controllers have transfer size limits. To allow to deal with this
>> max_transfer_size was introduced in the SPI core recently.
>> Use this new feature to read in chunks if needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>
> Michal has been working on a similar series, with some differences (I'll
> comment below). I think his latest work is here:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-December/063865.html
>
> Is there a particular reason you've continued on your series instead of
> reviewing/fixing his?
>
Latest version of Michal's patch set was sent beginning of December and has
received no comment since then, so I assumed it's dead.
If that's not the case, totally fine with me and I'll have a further look at it.
Regards, Heiner
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
>> index c2d1f65..69f3acf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
>> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static inline unsigned int m25p80_rx_nbits(struct spi_nor *nor)
>> * Read an address range from the nor chip. The address range
>> * may be any size provided it is within the physical boundaries.
>> */
>> -static int m25p80_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len,
>> +static int _m25p80_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len,
>> size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
>> {
>> struct m25p *flash = nor->priv;
>> @@ -153,6 +153,34 @@ static int m25p80_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Read in max_read_len chunks if len > max_read_len */
>> +static int m25p80_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len,
>> + size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct m25p *flash = nor->priv;
>> + /*
>> + * The controller transfer size limit refers to the overall transfer
>> + * including read command + actually read data. Therefore subtract
>> + * the command size when calculating the max read length.
>> + */
>> + size_t max_read_len = spi_max_transfer_size(flash->spi) -
>> + (m25p_cmdsz(nor) + nor->read_dummy / 8);
>> + size_t read_len;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + while (len > 0) {
>
> ^^ I really don't want this loop to be in m25p80.c. This should be in
> the core spi-nor.c, and then the driver (like m25p80.c, but also
> possibly other non-SPI drivers that also use spi-nor.c) can simply
> pass its limitation up the spi-nor.c. (See Michal's patch 10.)
>
> So I plan to take some form of Michal's and not yours. This will require
> a bit of rebasing.
>
> Brian
>
>> + read_len = min(len, max_read_len);
>> + ret = _m25p80_read(nor, from, read_len, retlen, buf);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + from += read_len;
>> + buf += read_len;
>> + len -= read_len;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * board specific setup should have ensured the SPI clock used here
>> * matches what the READ command supports, at least until this driver
>> --
>> 2.7.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-05 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-27 22:50 [PATCH 2/2] mtd: m25p80: consider max_transfer_size when reading Heiner Kallweit
2016-04-05 19:39 ` Brian Norris
2016-04-05 20:08 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2016-04-05 21:07 ` Brian Norris
2016-04-07 19:09 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-05-05 23:57 ` Brian Norris
2016-05-06 12:14 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-03 22:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-06-06 17:40 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-06 18:28 ` Brian Norris
2016-06-06 18:34 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-06 18:43 ` Brian Norris
2016-06-06 18:48 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-06 18:53 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-06-06 19:40 ` Michal Suchanek
2016-06-06 21:02 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-06-06 19:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-06-06 21:20 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-06-06 22:28 ` Marek Vasut
2016-06-07 4:52 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-06-06 23:07 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-07 6:03 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-06-07 8:10 ` Michal Suchanek
2016-06-07 20:42 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-06-08 19:51 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-06-09 7:12 ` Michal Suchanek
2016-06-17 20:13 ` Heiner Kallweit
2016-04-06 13:55 ` Cyrille Pitchen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57041B43.2000109@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
--cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).