* Re: cfi_cmdset_0001.c *_2_by_8() funcs
2000-07-25 15:00 cfi_cmdset_0001.c *_2_by_8() funcs David Vrabel
@ 2000-07-25 14:59 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2000-07-25 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Vrabel; +Cc: mtd
dvrabel@arcom.co.uk said:
> Is anyone else interested in this code?
Yes please.
> Should I send in a patch?
No. Send a SSH public key, I'll give you an account and you can merge it
directly.
--
dwmw2
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* cfi_cmdset_0001.c *_2_by_8() funcs
@ 2000-07-25 15:00 David Vrabel
2000-07-25 14:59 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2000-07-25 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mtd
Hi,
If written some *_2_by_8() funcs for read/write/erase for the Intel
Extended Command Set.
cf_intelext_setup() also selects the appropriate (1_by_16 or 2_by_8)
depending on cfi->interleave (hope this is the right way to do it). I
just cut-and-pasted the 1_by_16 func and changed all the read16/write16
to read8/write8. Is there a better way of doing it?
Is anyone else interested in this code? Should I send in a patch?
David Vrabel
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-07-25 14:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-07-25 15:00 cfi_cmdset_0001.c *_2_by_8() funcs David Vrabel
2000-07-25 14:59 ` David Woodhouse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox