From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17ZsQM-0006fd-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:17:54 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020731121648.GA18892@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20020731121648.GA18892@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20020731115703.GB28984@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20020731103419.GA23749@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <14572.1028067711@redhat.com> <2881.1028115952@redhat.com> <4164.1028116749@redhat.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: jffs2_scan_eraseblock() - errors Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:17:46 +0100 Message-ID: <6102.1028117866@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de said: > Ok, then the stuff should be caught by the command set. But some > tests don't hurt either. Should be caught by jffs2_can_mark_obsolete() which checks the device type. -- dwmw2