From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Artem Bityutskiy" <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
y2038@lists.linaro.org, "Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@google.com>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Deepa Dinamani" <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
"Souptick Joarder" <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Hyunchul Lee" <cheol.lee@lge.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: use timespec64 for inode timestamps
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:20:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61251850.EbJPfQiGNC@blindfold> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180620081311.126158-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Am Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2018, 10:12:58 CEST schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> Both vfs and the on-disk inode structures can deal with fine-grained
> timestamps now, so this is the last missing piece to make ubifs
> y2038-safe on 32-bit architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/file.c | 11 +++++------
> fs/ubifs/sb.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c
> index fd7eb6fe9090..02fab5c322c7 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
> @@ -1365,11 +1365,10 @@ int ubifs_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
> * granularity, they are not updated. This is an optimization.
> */
> static inline int mctime_update_needed(const struct inode *inode,
> - const struct timespec *now)
> + const struct timespec64 *now)
> {
> - struct timespec64 now64 = timespec_to_timespec64(*now);
> - if (!timespec64_equal(&inode->i_mtime, &now64) ||
> - !timespec64_equal(&inode->i_ctime, &now64))
> + if (!timespec64_equal(&inode->i_mtime, now) ||
> + !timespec64_equal(&inode->i_ctime, now))
> return 1;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1425,7 +1424,7 @@ int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *time,
> */
> static int update_mctime(struct inode *inode)
> {
> - struct timespec now = timespec64_to_timespec(current_time(inode));
> + struct timespec64 now = current_time(inode);
> struct ubifs_inode *ui = ubifs_inode(inode);
> struct ubifs_info *c = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
>
> @@ -1519,7 +1518,7 @@ static vm_fault_t ubifs_vm_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> struct page *page = vmf->page;
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
> struct ubifs_info *c = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
> - struct timespec now = timespec64_to_timespec(current_time(inode));
> + struct timespec64 now = current_time(inode);
> struct ubifs_budget_req req = { .new_page = 1 };
> int err, update_time;
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/sb.c b/fs/ubifs/sb.c
> index 8c25081a5109..fa0a982a6797 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/sb.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/sb.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int create_default_filesystem(struct ubifs_info *c)
> long long tmp64, main_bytes;
> __le64 tmp_le64;
> __le32 tmp_le32;
> - struct timespec ts;
> + struct timespec64 ts;
>
> /* Some functions called from here depend on the @c->key_len filed */
> c->key_len = UBIFS_SK_LEN;
> @@ -301,8 +301,8 @@ static int create_default_filesystem(struct ubifs_info *c)
> ino->creat_sqnum = cpu_to_le64(++c->max_sqnum);
> ino->nlink = cpu_to_le32(2);
>
> - ktime_get_real_ts(&ts);
> - ts = timespec_trunc(ts, DEFAULT_TIME_GRAN);
> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts);
> + ts = timespec64_trunc(ts, DEFAULT_TIME_GRAN);
> tmp_le64 = cpu_to_le64(ts.tv_sec);
> ino->atime_sec = tmp_le64;
> ino->ctime_sec = tmp_le64;
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Shall this patch go through the ubifs tree?
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-02 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 8:12 [PATCH] ubifs: use timespec64 for inode timestamps Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-02 14:20 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2018-07-13 14:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61251850.EbJPfQiGNC@blindfold \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cheol.lee@lge.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jrdr.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).