From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 169pjk-0001CK-00 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:38:00 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: MQuicquaro@necinfrontia.com Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: No space on jffs2 fs Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:48:27 +0000 Message-ID: <6410.1007135307@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: MQuicquaro@necinfrontia.com said: > Thanks for the help. So in essence what you are telling me is that > since the block size of my flash part is 256K, then the smallest jffs2 > file system that I can have is 5*256K or 1.25 MB? That's the smallest file system you can have without actually putting any data on it. You need 1.25MiB _above_ the amount of space actually taken by the data. This can be reduced. I'm just being overly conservative until I can prove that it's safe. -- dwmw2