From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16zgg5-0004BW-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:28:33 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Flash device IDs Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:25:51 +0100 Message-ID: <6448.1019492751@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl said: > In include/linux/mtd/nand_ids.h there is some information about device > IDs and device properties of NAND flash devices. > In drivers/usb/storage/sddr09.c there is very similar information. > Probably both tables should be merged. Yes, probably. If the SDDR-09 lets you talk to the raw flash rather than doing the SmartMedia format for you in hardware/firmware then that support probably also wants to be separated so it can be used on any hardware. -- dwmw2