From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Brian Norris , Linus Walleij , Russell King - ARM Linux , "arm@kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] move Versatile flash protection to the device tree Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 23:44:40 +0200 Message-ID: <6943273.jykU37cR72@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <20160404163626.GA30894@localhost> References: <20160404163626.GA30894@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 04 April 2016 09:36:26 Brian Norris wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:45:48AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Hi ARM SoC folks, > > > > now I'm tired of waiting for the MTD maintainers' word on this patch > > series. I sent a question about this approach on february 13: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=145537026603174&w=2 > > > > With subsequent pings on feb 22, mar 5, mar 31, and the cleanup > > missing the merge window. > > > > As you can see the flash protection patch also caters for the > > RealView flash protection bits. > > > > Please pull this into the ARM SoC tree for testing in linux-next > > for the v4.7 series. If the MTD people appear again and have issues > > you can always drop the branch. > > > > > > Acked-by: Brian Norris > Merged into next/drivers, thanks! Arnd