From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17LLMi-0000w1-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:10:04 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020621095028.20837.qmail@linuxmail.org> References: <20020621095028.20837.qmail@linuxmail.org> To: "xyz xyz" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: X11 or microwindows on a DOC using GRUB?? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:09:39 +0100 Message-ID: <6989.1024654179@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: watsup@linuxmail.org said: > now we need to develop some configurator modules and an user > interface on our X client,so the problem is shall i go ahead with > development for X11 or microwindows? > the dilemma is bcoz of the fact that X11 client is providing a better > resolution as compared to microwindows,but i feel for an embedded > device microwindows is the rite choice,(as far as size is concerned > ,with microwindows we are savin lot of space but anyway we r not using > that space,it will b free) The TinyX server used on the iPAQ is only about 700KiB. That's not really so huge, although it's still larger than microwindows. You might also consider using Qt-Embedded. -- dwmw2