* Re: MTD CVS update: 'mtd/fs/jffs2 dir.c file.c write.c'
[not found] <E16fIKq-0000w3-00@infradead.org>
@ 2002-02-25 15:38 ` Adam Wozniak
2002-02-25 15:46 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Adam Wozniak @ 2002-02-25 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-mtd
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Update of /home/cvs/mtd/fs/jffs2
> In directory infradead.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3585
>
> Modified Files:
> dir.c file.c write.c
> Log Message:
> Obey the new rule that you must still be holding the alloc_sem when adding nodes to the lists and hence obsoleting other nodes
>
Should these wind up in the 2_4 branch as well?
--Adam
--
Adam Wozniak (KG6GZR) COM DEV Broadband - Digital and Software Systems
awozniak@comdev.cc 805 Aerovista Place, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
http://www.comdev.cc
Voice: (805) 544-1089 Fax: (805) 544-2055
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: MTD CVS update: 'mtd/fs/jffs2 dir.c file.c write.c'
2002-02-25 15:38 ` MTD CVS update: 'mtd/fs/jffs2 dir.c file.c write.c' Adam Wozniak
@ 2002-02-25 15:46 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2002-02-25 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adam Wozniak; +Cc: linux-mtd
awozniak@comdev.cc said:
> Should these wind up in the 2_4 branch as well?
No. The rules changed to support the extra stuff that NAND flash does when
we add nodes to the lists. It's not required in the 2.4 branch.
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-25 15:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E16fIKq-0000w3-00@infradead.org>
2002-02-25 15:38 ` MTD CVS update: 'mtd/fs/jffs2 dir.c file.c write.c' Adam Wozniak
2002-02-25 15:46 ` David Woodhouse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox