From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 175ArE-00052X-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 20:42:44 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020507204659.A20246@kosh.hut.fi> References: <20020507204659.A20246@kosh.hut.fi> <20020506151930.A15109@kosh.hut.fi> <20020503201900.A32761@kosh.hut.fi> <20020502155602.A8801@kosh.hut.fi> <13211.1020346858@redhat.com> <20020503201900.A32761@kosh.hut.fi> <28528.1020448474@redhat.com> <20020506151930.A15109@kosh.hut.fi> <25024.1020783726@redhat.com> To: Jarkko Lavinen Cc: MTD List , jffs-dev@axis.com Subject: Re: Benchmarking JFFS2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 20:42:11 +0100 Message-ID: <7557.1020800531@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: jlavi@iki.fi said: > The code was not the latest and I really hope I am not causing a > wrong alarm. Kernel 2.4.15, JFFS2 and mtd code from 11 February 2002 > snapshot in ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/people/dwmw2/mtd/cvs/. Forgive me - my brain goes in and out of phase with JFFS2, and it's mostly out at this point. Thomas seems generally more clueful than I. Version 1.63 of scan.c contains what was intended to be an optimisation (from Joakim Tjernlund), but which should also have the effect of preventing obsolete nodes from ending up on the lists. That's in the trunk code but not the jffs2-2_4-branch. -- dwmw2