public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: seeking help on JFFS2
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 08:49:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7618.1036658942@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IGEFJKJNHJDCBKALBJLLOELLFHAA.joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se>

joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se said:
> Why does JEDEC end up in cfi_cmdset_0001.c? 

CFI only defines how you _probe_ chips. The actual Intel command set is the
same as it's always been, likewise the AMD one. This is why jedec_probe
passes control to the CFI drivers and all the other chip drivers are
deprecated.

> If it should end up in cfi_cmdset_0001.c, why does it not set cmdset_priv? 

IIRC because cmdset_priv is just a copy of the extended CFI table from the 
chip, which we don't have in the case of a non-CFI chip. It's that which 
holds the details of whether we can do erase suspend, etc.

Perhaps the table in jedec_probe should also contain a 'fake' extended CFI 
table. More sensibly, perhaps we should have a structure in the cmdset_priv 
with just the flags we care about, and at probe time either parse the 
extended CFI table or copy those flags from the jedec_probe table.

For now, we just assume jedec-probed chips have none of the extended 
features.

--
dwmw2

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-07  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-06 16:09 seeking help on JFFS2 Junping Zhang
2002-11-06 16:14 ` David Woodhouse
2002-11-07  8:28   ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-11-07  8:49     ` David Woodhouse [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-06 18:26 Junping Zhang
2002-11-06 13:13 Junping Zhang
2002-11-05 19:56 Junping Zhang
2002-11-05 21:08 ` Jörn Engel
2002-11-05 17:39 Junping Zhang
2002-11-05 19:31 ` Jörn Engel
2002-11-05 17:17 Jeffrey Lim
2002-11-05 19:32 ` Jörn Engel
2002-11-05 13:40 Junping Zhang
2002-11-05 16:41 ` Jörn Engel
2002-11-06  3:57 ` Darren Freeman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7618.1036658942@passion.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox