From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16cr0x-0007I8-00 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:51:43 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: References: To: Robert Kaiser Cc: "Brian J. Fox" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de Subject: Re: MTD concat layer Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:02:56 +0000 Message-ID: <7861.1014051776@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: rob@sysgo.de said: > OK, so we all finally agree that BUG() is the way to go (rather than > returning -EINVAL. Right ? As long as you make sure you can't trigger the BUG() from the mtdchar ioctl() routine, yes. -- dwmw2