public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: "openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org" <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>
Subject: ubifs: handling dirty data (writing back) + power cuts
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:17:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bc0ee19-2943-3503-046e-130de73a2cdf@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,


my system is setup as follows:

# mount | grep ubifs
/dev/ubi0_1 on /mount/ubifs type ubifs (rw,noatime,assert=read-only,ubi=0,vol=1)

# cat /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs
500
# cat /proc/sys/vm/dirty_expire_centisecs
3000

(5 s and 30 s respectively) and I'm currently debugging some data issues
related to power cuts.


My actual problem is related to ubifs behaviour for power cuts happening
between 5 and 35 seconds after saving a file:
date > /mount/ubifs/test.txt && sleep 15 && echo CUT POWER *NOW*

On the next boot test.txt exists but it's EMPTY (file size 0).

For newly created files above behaviour is not the worst one - however
I'd expect such file to not exist at all.

The biggest problem is when dealing with existing files. In such case
power cut means loosing it completely. I don't get *old* content nor
*new* content.


I noticed this behaviour with kernel 5.10 and also reproduced it with
5.4, 4.14 and 4.4.

Is this a bug or some quirky feature? Can I do anything to avoid such
situations except modifying all user space to call fsync() when needed?

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

             reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25 14:17 Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2022-02-25 14:25 ` ubifs: handling dirty data (writing back) + power cuts Rafał Miłecki
2022-02-25 14:46   ` Richard Weinberger
2022-02-28 13:36 ` Rafał Miłecki
2022-03-08  1:31 ` Sergey Ryazanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7bc0ee19-2943-3503-046e-130de73a2cdf@gmail.com \
    --to=zajec5@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox