From: <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>
To: <p.yadav@ti.com>, <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<Takahiro.Kuwano@infineon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] mtd: spi-nor: core: Use auto-detection only once
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 07:18:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f570c32-d0be-97ba-0a1b-9aca93cfbbf1@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420103427.47867-4-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Hi, Pratyush,
I forgot to remove few checks, would you please remove them when applying?
See below.
On 4/20/22 13:34, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> In case spi_nor_match_name() returned NULL, the auto detection was
> issued twice. There's no reason to try to detect the same chip twice,
> do the auto detection only once.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index b9cc8bbf1f62..b55d922d46dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -2896,13 +2896,14 @@ static const struct flash_info *spi_nor_get_flash_info(struct spi_nor *nor,
> {
> const struct flash_info *info = NULL;
>
> - if (name)
> + if (name) {
> info = spi_nor_match_name(nor, name);
> + if (IS_ERR(info))
> + return info;
As Michael suggested spi_nor_match_name() returns NULL or valid entry, so this
check is not necessary, let's remove them.
> + }
> /* Try to auto-detect if chip name wasn't specified or not found */
> if (!info)
> - info = spi_nor_read_id(nor);
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(info))
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> + return spi_nor_read_id(nor);
>
> /*
> * If caller has specified name of flash model that can normally be
> @@ -2994,7 +2995,9 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name,
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> info = spi_nor_get_flash_info(nor, name);
> - if (IS_ERR(info))
> + if (!info)
> + return -ENOENT;
also according to Michael, this change is not needed as spi_nor_get_flash_info() can't
return NULL. Here we can keep the code as it was. Let me know if you want me to respin.
> + else if (IS_ERR(info))
> return PTR_ERR(info);
>
> nor->info = info;
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-21 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 10:34 [PATCH v4 00/11] mtd: spi-nor: Rework Octal DTR methods Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] mtd: spi-nor: Rename method, s/spi_nor_match_id/spi_nor_match_name Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] mtd: spi-nor: Introduce spi_nor_match_id() Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] mtd: spi-nor: core: Use auto-detection only once Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-21 7:18 ` Tudor.Ambarus [this message]
2022-04-21 13:16 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-21 13:41 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-27 5:20 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-27 7:13 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] mtd: spi-nor: core: Introduce method for RDID op Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] mtd: spi-nor: manufacturers: Use spi_nor_read_id() core method Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] mtd: spi-nor: core: Add helpers to read/write any register Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: Rework spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_enable() Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] mtd: spi-nor: spansion: Rework spi_nor_cypress_octal_dtr_enable() Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] mtd: spi-nor: Introduce templates for SPI NOR operations Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] mtd: spi-nor: spansion: Remove status polling on volatile registers write Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 20:04 ` Michael Walle
2022-04-20 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: " Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-20 20:05 ` Michael Walle
2022-04-27 9:31 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] mtd: spi-nor: Rework Octal DTR methods Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f570c32-d0be-97ba-0a1b-9aca93cfbbf1@microchip.com \
--to=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=Takahiro.Kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox