From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.192]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1E8c8G-0002fy-Bq for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 07:12:32 -0400 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s18so299585nze for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 04:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82e4189c050826041230ec96fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:12:23 +0500 From: Adil Hafeez To: tglx@linutronix.de In-Reply-To: <1125054422.20120.153.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <82e4189c05082603546248689a@mail.gmail.com> <1125054422.20120.153.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Flash erase wait time List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Thanks, Thomas. I am using 2.4.20 kernel, with Linux MTD framework backported from 2.4.31. The $id flash in cfi_cmdset_0002.c file is: $Id: cfi_cmdset_0002.c,v 1.62 2003/01/24 23:30:13 dwmw2 Exp $ Adil On 8/26/05, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:54 +0500, Adil Hafeez wrote: > > Was it really required to double check the polarity bit, or there are > > some timeout timer issues with my mips port ? >=20 > 1. We have no idea, which version of cfi_cmset_0002.c you are using. > Please provide the $Id string on top of the file. The kernel version and > the applied patches on top of this kernel. >=20 > 2. If you send patches, read linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches first >=20 > 3 . From your patch: >=20 > file: /home/embedded/linux-2.4.20_palmchip/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0= 002.c,v >=20 > Please read > http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/source.html#kernelversions >=20 > tglx >=20 >=20 >