From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Dietrich To: Christian Dietrich Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Removing dead code References: <4C5F9715.1030806@snapgear.com> <86tyn4ximi.fsf@peer.zerties.org> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:07:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86tyn4ximi.fsf@peer.zerties.org> (Christian Dietrich's message of "Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:03:49 +0200") Message-ID: <861v9ptzex.fsf@peer.zerties.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Roman Zippel , John Stultz , Dominik Brodowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Alexander Kurz , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Michael Roth , Greg Ungerer , Christoph Hellwig , Finn Thain , Tony Lindgren , vamos-dev@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, Geert Uytterhoeven , Lennart Sorensen , Russell King , Anatolij Gustschin , Sam Creasey , Greg Ungerer , linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, Mike Frysinger , Sean MacLennan , Joe Perches , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Maxim Kuvyrkov , Thomas Gleixner , Jiri Kosina , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Wolfram Sang , Ralf Baechle , Martin Schwidefsky , Manuel Lauss , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Christian Dietrich writes: >> Hi Christian, >> I don't have any problems with any of these from a >> m68knommu point of view. I can merge them via the >> m68knommu git tree if you want? > > If there aren't any complaints from the m68k people i'm fine with > that. Hm, last message was two weeks ago, so perhaps the m68k people (with mmu) have no complaints with these patches and they can be included in the m68knommu tree? greetz didi --=20 (=CE=BB x . x x) (=CE=BB x . x x) -- See how beatiful the lambda is No documentation is better than bad documentation -- Das Ausdrucken dieser Mail wird urheberrechtlich verfolgt.