From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bPP9z-00061L-Pw for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:09:50 +0000 From: Kalle Valo To: =?utf-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= Cc: Brian Norris , "linux-mtd\@lists.infradead.org" , Stephen Rothwell , "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" , linux-next , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree References: <20160719160831.79c0303f@canb.auug.org.au> <8760s2w369.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:09:16 +0300 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki=22's?= message of "Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:51:48 +0200") Message-ID: <871t2qw1cz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki writes: > On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Stephen Rothwell writes: >> >>> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build >>> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: >>> >>> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c: In function 'bcm47xxsflash_bcma_pr= obe': >>> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c:299:17: error: implicit declaration= of function 'ioremap_cache' [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] >>> b47s->window =3D ioremap_cache(res->start, resource_size(res)); >>> ^ >>> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c:299:15: warning: assignment makes p= ointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] >>> b47s->window =3D ioremap_cache(res->start, resource_size(res)); >>> ^ >>> >>> Caused by commit >>> >>> 57d8f7dd2132 ("bcma: allow enabling serial flash support on non-MIPS = SoCs") >>> >>> I have reverted that commit for today. >> >> Thanks, kbuild bot also notified about this. >> >> Rafa=C5=82, as the merge window is getting really close I would like to >> revert this for now and we can reapply it once we the problem is fully >> solved. And we can use my pending branch for build testing the patch >> with kbuild bot. What do you think? > > The simplest fix sounds pretty much as simple as the revert. The problem is that I don't have much time, I need to send the pull request to Dave within next few days. The fix might create other problems so I'm not enthusiastic about iterating with this patch at the moment. I think it can wait for 4.9. --=20 Kalle Valo