From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/21] fs: Allow sysfs and cgroupfs to share super blocks between user namespaces
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 11:27:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bn43qqlb.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160518161618.GC129218@ubuntu-hedt> (Seth Forshee's message of "Wed, 18 May 2016 11:16:18 -0500")
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:45:31AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > But if we do that it violates some of the assumptions of the patch to
>> > rework MNT_NODEV on your testing branch (and also those behind patch 2
>> > in this series). Something will need to be changed there to prevent a
>> > regression in mount behavior when a user ns tries to mount without
>> > MNT_NODEV when the mount inherited from its parent has it set.
>>
>> Thank you for pointing that out. I will look into that.
>>
>> I believe I know exactly what you are talking about. Of the choices I
>> think it is better to a minor localized change in the fs_fully_visible
>> logic than it is to cause problems elsewhere.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> >> Apologies for not catching this earlier.
>> >
>> > Actually this is a more recent patch, so you possibly hadn't seen it
>> > before.
>> >
>> >> I am looking at folding all of this into the patch that introduces
>> >> sget_userns so that even bisects won't have regresssions.
>> >
>> > That's fine with me.
>>
>> And thank you for keeping everything as separate patches. That is at
>> least helping me catch up. Even if I don't agree that these things
>> should be separate come merge time.
>
> Honestly I probably would have squashed some of them into that first
> patch myself if you hadn't already applied it to your testing branch, so
> that's all just luck.
>
> Keep in mind that I also have that patch for mqueue that isn't in this
> series, and I haven't yet checked to see if the 4.7 merges introduce
> anything which is going to require updating these patches. I was
> planning to wait and send out updates after -rc1, but if you want that
> stuff sooner just let me know.
As unfortunately I don't have anything going into -rc1 I am working on
this right now.
Let me finish sorting out the sget_userns and mnt nodev mess and I will
push something out and then we can compare notes. I think I have mqueue
covered by other changes. As it is in the set of filesystems that
should just use sget_userns.
I am sorting through the nodev corner of this now. It should just be a
day or two.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-18 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1461699046-30485-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com>
[not found] ` <1461699046-30485-4-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com>
2016-05-17 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] fs: Allow sysfs and cgroupfs to share super blocks between user namespaces Eric W. Biederman
2016-05-17 23:58 ` Seth Forshee
2016-05-18 15:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-05-18 16:16 ` Seth Forshee
2016-05-18 16:27 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2016-04-26 19:36 [PATCH v4 00/21] Support fuse mounts in " Seth Forshee
2016-04-26 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] fs: Allow sysfs and cgroupfs to share super blocks between " Seth Forshee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bn43qqlb.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox